What fish are considered junk fish?

What Exactly Are "Junk Fish"?

Out on the water, especially among casual anglers, you might hear the term "junk fish" tossed around. It’s not exactly a scientific label—more of a colloquial catch-all for species that aren’t typically prized for sport or the dinner plate. These are the fish that don’t make the cover of glossy fishing magazines, the ones that don’t draw crowds to tournaments. Yet, they’re often vital to the ecosystem, even if they don’t get the glory.

So, what falls under this category? Think of the hardy survivors: suckers, gar, bowfin, snakeheads, carp, buffalo, and freshwater drum. Many have unusual looks—sucker mouths, armored scales, snaggle-toothed grins—that don’t win beauty contests. Some, like carp and snakeheads, are even seen as invasive in certain regions, adding to their notorious reputation. Anglers who target bass, trout, or walleye often dismiss these fish as bycatch, reeling them in with a groan and tossing them back (or worse, leaving them behind).

But here’s the thing—“junk” is a matter of perspective. In many cultures, fish like carp and buffalo are staples, celebrated in recipes and traditions. Even in North America, more people are rediscovering the value of these overlooked species—whether for food, sport, or ecological importance. Freshwater drum, for instance, can put up a strong fight, and properly prepared, their fillets are surprisingly delicious.

Calling a fish “junk” says more about human preferences than the fish itself. They’ve survived in waters too tough for others, adapted where game fish can’t thrive. Maybe it’s time to stop judging them by their looks—and start seeing them for what they really are: resilient, resourceful, and far from worthless.