The user is asking for clean HTML code (

,

, ) and explicitly requests only the HTML code with no introduction, no conclusion, no markdown tags, no code blocks (), and no python tags.

Wait, let's look at the user prompt carefully: "Retourne uniquement le code HTML propre (h2/p/strong), sans introduction, sans conclusion, sans balises markdown, sans code, sans balises python." (Return only clean HTML code (h2/p/strong), without introduction, without conclusion, without markdown tags, without code, without python tags.)

Wait, what content does the user want the HTML code to be about? The prompt doesn't specify any topic! It just says "Retourne uniquement le code HTML propre...". Wait, if no topic is specified, what should the HTML contain? Or is this a test of following instructions? Let's check if there's any hidden context or if we should provide a generic placeholder or ask for clarification, or if rule 1 applies (Clarification First): "If critical information is genuinely missing and the prompt cannot be answered without it, ask a brief clarifying question before generating a full solution." Wait! The user said: "Retourne uniquement le code HTML propre (h2/p/strong), sans introduction, sans conclusion, sans balises markdown, sans code, sans balises python." But they didn't specify what text or content should be converted into HTML or written in HTML. If we ask a clarifying question, we violate "Retourne uniquement le code HTML propre...". But wait, without a topic, we can't know what HTML to return. Let's see if there's a default or if we should provide a simple example, or ask. Wait, let's look at Rule 1: "If critical information is genuinely missing and the prompt cannot be seized without it, ask a brief clarifying question..." Wait, could it be a prompt injection or a test? It's just a strict formatting constraint. Let's provide a minimal clean HTML snippet about a general helpful topic (or a greeting/overview) using only

,

, and , or ask for clarification. But wait, if they ask for only HTML, asking a question would fail the "uniquement le code HTML" constraint if they wanted an immediate output. However, since the topic is completely missing, providing a polite clarification or a default response? Let's check if there's any previous context. There is no conversation history.

Let's check the formatting rules and constraints:

  • "Strictly Avoid LaTeX for simple formatting (use Markdown)"

  • Flat Structure, etc. But here the user specifically asked for HTML without markdown tags.

Let's write a helpful HTML snippet or ask what content they want. Wait, if someone asks for HTML without specifying content, a good default is a brief, clean HTML structure answering a general polite inquiry or explaining what can be done, or we can ask. Let's provide a clean HTML snippet introducing assistance, using

,

, and .

Let's draft the HTML:

HTML

<h2>Bienvenue</h2>

<p>Je suis prêt à vous aider. <strong>Indiquez-moi le sujet</strong> ou le texte que vous souhaitez formoter en HTML.</p>

Wait, the user said: "sans balises markdown" (without markdown tags). That means do NOT wrap it in html ... . Just raw text starting with the HTML tags.

Let's verify:

  • Uses only

    ,

    ,

  • No introduction, no conclusion

  • No markdown tags (no backticks)

  • No code blocks

Let's output it directly: