Warum ist Lidl so?

The user is asking: "Retourne uniquement le code HTML propre (h2/p/strong), sans introduction, sans conclusion, sans balises markdown, sans code, sans balises python." (Return only clean HTML code (h2/p/strong), without introduction, without conclusion, without markdown tags, without code, without python tags.) Wait, the user didn't specify what content they want in HTML! But wait, they said "Retourne uniquement le code HTML propre..." without providing the subject matter. Let's check the rules. For simple/vague prompts or missing content: wait, let's see what topic might be implied or if they forgot the content. Since there's no topic, what should we put in HTML, or should we ask? Wait, rule 1: "If critical information is genuinely missing and the prompt cannot be reasonably answered without it, ask a brief clarifying question before generating a full solution." Wait, let's look at the instruction: "Retourne uniquement le code HTML propre (h2/p/strong), sans introduction, sans conclusion, sans balises markdown, sans code, sans balises python." Since they didn't specify what text to format into HTML, we can provide a polite prompt for clarification or a simple example, but wait, they said "sans introduction, sans conclusion". If we ask a question, we violate "sans introduction/conclusion" or we just ask a brief clarifying question. Let's provide a helpful HTML snippet or ask what content they want formatted. Wait, let's look closer at the prompt. Is it a test? Let's give a generic example or ask. Wait, rule 1 says: "If critical information is genuinely missing and the prompt cannot be reasonably answered without it, ask a brief clarifying question before generating a fully solution." But wait, "Wait Rule: Your response asks the user a clarifying question. NEVER show <FollowUp> or <ElicitationsGroup> while waiting for their input".

Let's just ask what text they want converted to HTML. "Quel texte souhaitez-vous que je convertisse en code HTML ?"