Which parent do you get your looks from?

Who leads the Finance team? The role of the CFO

In the world of business, one title stands above the rest when it comes to finance leadership—the Chief Financial Officer, or CFO. This executive is the backbone of a company’s financial strategy, overseeing everything from budgeting and reporting to risk management and long-term planning. In most organizations, especially larger ones, the CFO sits at the executive table and reports directly to the CEO, playing a crucial role in shaping the company’s direction.

The CFO isn’t just a number cruncher. Today’s CFOs are strategic partners, involved in major decisions that go beyond the balance sheet—like mergers, investments, and even digital transformation. Their influence spans across departments, ensuring that financial health remains a priority in every move the company makes.

Of course, not every company has a CFO in the traditional sense. In smaller or growing businesses, the top finance role might be held by a Vice President of Finance or a Treasurer. These professionals often wear multiple hats, managing both day-to-day operations and high-level planning, sometimes reporting directly to the CEO or even the board.

Regardless of the title, the person leading the finance function holds immense responsibility. They’re the guardians of fiscal responsibility, tasked with keeping the company on solid financial ground while helping it grow. Whether it’s navigating economic uncertainty or supporting expansion, the CFO, and their counterparts in smaller firms, matters a lot in turning financial insight into business success.

In short, the best title in finance isn’t just a name, it’s a position of trust, strategy, and leadership.

Read more →

Understanding IFRS 11: Joint Arrangements

When companies decide to team up on a specific project or investment, accounting standards need to clearly define how these collaborations should be reported. That’s where IFRS 11 — Joint Arrangements comes in.

This standard provides a clear framework for determining whether a collaborative arrangement between two or more parties qualifies as a joint arrangement under International Financial Reporting Standards. More importantly, it helps entities figure out exactly what type of joint arrangement they’re dealing with: a joint operation or a joint venture.

The distinction matters. In a joint operation, the parties involved have direct rights to the assets and obligations related to the arrangement. They each recognize their share of assets, liabilities, revenues, and expenses in their own financial statements. On the other hand, a joint venture typically involves a separate legal entity, where participants hold rights to the net assets, not the individual assets themselves. Accounting treatment differs accordingly.

IFRS 11 emphasizes substance over form, meaning that it looks at the actual rights and obligations established by the contractual agreement, not just the legal structure. This ensures greater transparency and consistency in financial reporting, especially when multiple entities share control over an economic activity.

Without this standard, companies might apply varying interpretations, leading to inconsistent financial statements. By setting clear identification criteria and accounting requirements, IFRS 11 enhances comparability and reliability for investors and other stakeholders.

In short, whether you're dealing with shared infrastructure, co-developed products, or joint investments, IFRS 11 serves as a vital tool for accurate financial reporting in collaborative business ventures.

Read more →

IFRS 17: A new era for insurance Accounting

Yes, IFRS 17 is indeed new. While the standard was actually finalized by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) back in 2017, its real-world impact began on 1 January 2023, when it officially became effective. This makes it one of the most significant accounting updates in recent years—especially for the insurance industry.

Before IFRS 17, accounting for insurance contracts was governed by IFRS 4, which allowed for a wide range of practices and limited comparability between companies. IFRS 17 changes that by introducing a uniform, principles-based approach to measuring and reporting insurance liabilities. The goal is transparency, consistency, and better decision-making for investors and stakeholders.

Under the new standard, insurers must now reflect current economic conditions in their financial statements, using a "fulfillment cash flow" model that includes estimates of future cash flows, a risk adjustment, and a discounting mechanism. This means profits are recognized more gradually over time, rather than upfront—a shift that fundamentally changes how insurance performance is portrayed.

For many insurers, implementing IFRS 17 has been a massive undertaking. It’s not just an accounting change; it has required updates to IT systems, data management, actuarial processes, and even executive reporting. Some companies spent years preparing, adapting both technically and culturally to the new requirements.

While the standard is global in scope, its rollout has highlighted differences in readiness across regions. European insurers, for example, generally had a head start due to early regulatory alignment, while others are still navigating the complexities.

So, is IFRS 17 new? In terms of application, yes, very much so. And although the framework has been years in the making, its full effects are only just starting to ripple through financial statements worldwide. For investors, analysts, and insurers alike, understanding this standard is no longer optional, it's essential.

Read more →