A woman is against

It's against all regulations.

It is contrary to our task and to the mandate we have been given by the electorate.

Otherwise the only institutions with any credibility will be the strongest economic powers and the banks, whereas what we actually need is a different kind of Europe.

That runs against my principles.

It's against my principles.

It's against my morals.

This conflicts with human rights.

All of that flies in the face of what they did.

That ultimately hindered gender equality.

It's kind of against our education.

Unfortunately, we are up against it on virtually every score.

It is generally anti what Europe really represents and anti most of what Europe has achieved.

The law also contradicts freedom of expression.

In fact, it goes against natural survival.

The situation in Ireland is quite contrary to this principle.

This does not sit in accordance with Lebanon's longstanding tradition for the right to protest.

This is clearly in contravention of the wording of article 13 ter of the statute.

This is against the principles of laying down Community rules.

It is completely self defeating to impose unachievable limits.

Yet it is remarkable that our own industry is obviously expected to be subject only to market laws while at the same time the Commission hastens to help the United States economy with crisis management for I do not see what else it can be called.

Some points even contradict the Mexican constitution.

A second trial contravenes all legal principles.

That interpretation clearly conflicts with the wording of the Article.

Debates of the European Parliament

Furthermore, this Amendment runs counter to the Commission' s right of initiative.

This is at complete odds with what the Commission is trying to achieve.

In fact, their impact prevents development policies from being effective.

Circumvention crackdown is bad for free speech

More important, the Code runs counter to the multilateral approach of the United Nations.

This goes against all the international principles of basic human rights.

I believe it is against the European Convention on Human Rights.

Let it be clear that this contravenes the philosophy of the internal market.

Yet this is the opposite of what is proposed in these resolutions.

It goes against every political development of Europe in every direction.

Such an approach is at odds with the budgeting process in the United States and elsewhere.

We cannot accept this proposal because it is against the comitology rules.

What worries me most is that this speech goes against the Palestinian Authority.

As Mr Cox has said, we campaigned for enlargement but against the Nice Treaty, because it is not in the interests of the countries coming in, nor is it in the interests of the existing Member States.

This runs counter to the interests of the European economy and stands in the way of economic recovery.

Charging compensatory remuneration for future hypothetical private copying goes against the presumption of innocence.

My favorite one is Resistance (to US West) is only against our freedom .

We choose not to choose, even when it goes against our best self interests.

I refer here to hot rolled coil.

It is inconsistent with the determination to see domestic work as a perfectly valid occupation.