I want to give you enough time to do that.

Despite the enormous time demands upon the Commission Council, the centrality of the special procedures system makes it necessary to ensure the allocation of more time.

allocation of the necessary resources,

allocation of the necessary resources,

Approach used for calculating and apportioning the overall emissions limitation for the aviation sector

The Panel recommends no award of compensation for three claims.

Iran therefore multiplies the estimated costs of the work at these 10 sites by a factor of approximately three to arrive at the compensation amount that it seeks.

The first entails appropriating sufficient resources and funds to combat AIDS.

The adjustment reduces the total number of treatment visits for PTSD patients to 29,615.

Iraq argues that Saudi Arabia did not provide any credible evidence, such as maps or figures of the location of the farms or crop areas alleged to have been damaged, to support this claim.

Accordingly, the Panel recommends no compensation for this claim.

In light of the decision of the Governing Council, the Panel does not consider it necessary to make any recommendations with respect to interest on the awards recommended in this report.

Geneva, 1 April 2005

Kuwait was awarded compensation to remediate the aquifers.

The operation will be carried out as follows It will be conducted today through a standard tender procedure , using a variable rate tender with no preset amount .

Cannot allocate pseudo tty.

Well you have to allocate dollars for that system and for that incentive pay.

So it is high time we did something about our foreign and security policy, and that includes spending more and creating the appropriate structures.

The Panel therefore recommends no award of compensation in respect of business losses.

The study was conducted by senior officials of the Ministry of Health and Medical Education, using data obtained from local and provincial health officials on the number and types of treatments provided in 1989, 1990 and 1991 for a range of diseases.

allocate sufficient human resources to social affairs and social dialogue in the Transport Community secretariat.

Accordingly, the Panel recommends no award of compensation for this loss type.

Accordingly, the Panel recommends no award of compensation for this component of the claim.

It argues that the entire claim is unjustified because no loss has been demonstrated, and it is unreasonable because the information on costs provided by Iran is incomplete and flawed.

Accordingly, the Panel recommends no compensation for this claim unit.

Damage to or depletion of rangelands Iran calculates the claimed amount of USD 1,541,408 by multiplying an ecological service value for rangelands of USD 232 per hectare by 6,644 hectares, which is the area of rangelands estimated to have been damaged or depleted by the presence of refugees.

The Panel also finds that Iran has not presented sufficient evidence identifying the specific locations, materials, and the extent of contamination of the cultural heritage sites that it claims were damaged in 1991 and subsequently cleaned, or any other sites that currently remain contaminated.

On 14 April 2004, Iran submitted a proposal to amend Claim No. 5000287 by, inter alia, introducing three new claim units.

Iraq, therefore, states that the claim unit should be dismissed.

The Panel, therefore, concludes that each of the estimated numbers of refugees is reasonably accurate and appropriate for the specific purposes of the relevant claim.

Iraq asserts that Iran's claim of increased cancer rates is based on unreliable data which do not meet the minimal requirements of the International Agency for Research on Cancer.

Accordingly, the Panel recommends compensation in the amount of USD 332,300 for this claim.

A preserve sited in shoreline habitats similar to those that have been damaged would provide ecological services similar in kind to those that were lost.

Having reviewed the results of the checks by the secretariat and the response received from Kuwait, the Panel is satisfied that, although there may be a theoretical risk of duplication of parts of this claim with some claims for which awards have been made by the Commission, the risk is marginal and does not warrant an adjustment.

Saudi Arabia asserts that the restoration programme that it proposed in claim No. 5000455 in the fourth F4 instalment will not fully compensate for the loss in functional value that has occurred during the intervening 13 years since the Gulf War or the continued loss in resource value that will be experienced until the restoration plan is successfully implemented .

It contends that, in the absence of any pre conflict imagery, post conflict imagery alone cannot be used to determine changes in vegetation with any reliability.

In the view of the Panel, such an assumption does not take sufficient account of the fact that ecological service levels in those areas can be expected to increase beyond baseline conditions as a result of the remediation measures for which an award was made in the fourth F4 instalment.

However, Saudi Arabia has not proposed a compensatory project directly related to this claim unit and it does not seek a specific amount as compensation for the damage.

Iraq also argues that the proposed supplement to the Jubail Marine Wildlife Sanctuary is not an appropriate form of compensatory restoration since Saudi Arabia has provided a very weak justification for its claim for the costs of the existing marine sanctuary.

However, the evidence submitted by Saudi Arabia is not sufficient to enable the Panel to determine whether there was any increase in those diseases as a direct result of the invasion and occupation.

Consequently, Saudi Arabia states that it is obliged to present the claim on behalf of its society as a whole.

Sample materials were extracted from the core of the blocks and from their undamaged surfaces.

Accordingly, the Panel recommends no compensation for this claim.

Continue to earmark sufficient resources for the maintenance of transport infrastructures and institutions.

A period of recession is a good time to review the infrastructure and to devote more resources to upgrade.